| INTRODUCTION | | | | MEASURE ACTUAL PERFORMANCE |
| Do you have inventory accuracy problems? Typical | | | | Why It's Difficult |
| symptoms:o Lots of inventory errorso Surprise | | | | This too, is more difficult than it sounds. Many |
| backorders, unplanned shortages, "lost material"o | | | | companies are simply unable to reconcile book to |
| Nobody believes the records-- numerous calls to | | | | physical inventory because they:o Have multiple, |
| "check" on availabilityo Air freight bill exceeds the | | | | incompatible inventory systems.o Can't master the |
| national debto Nasty financial reporting "surprises"o | | | | timing "cutoffs" for count reconciliation.o Poorly define |
| Lack of consensus on importance of accuracyo Lack | | | | and enforce material and transaction flow procedures |
| of consensus on how to measure ito Inability to | | | | and policies.o Don't have people assigned to and/or |
| reconcile inventories, cycle countso Error causes | | | | schooled in inventory records reconciliation. |
| largely unknowno Weak/no company tradition of data | | | | Initial Survey |
| accuracyo New systems/software implementation | | | | You'll need an initial survey to assess the level of |
| causing more confusion | | | | accuracy. This is recommended, even if there is an |
| Solution recommendations are presented as follows... | | | | ongoing system in place, to help verify how well it is |
| ORGANIZE PROJECT | | | | working. To assess the level of inventory accuracy, |
| Results are usually best when there is a bit of a crisis | | | | pick a representative and statistically valid sample of |
| atmosphere established. Business as usual won't | | | | items, crossing different product lines, processes and |
| usually serve to get serious inventory accuracy | | | | areas. Consult an expert in QC or SPC (Statistical |
| problems fixed within two months. Sometimes a | | | | Process Control) if not sure how to do this. |
| humbling blow, such as losing millions in an inventory | | | | Make sure you have agreement on what is to be |
| "write-down", or an unfavorable "write-up" by a | | | | measured and how. Get agreement on the |
| customer, is helpful to shatter the status quo and | | | | measurement criteria (see section II, above). If there is |
| energize an organization to begin work in earnest on a | | | | more than one inventory system, agree on which |
| solution. Top level executive action works best to | | | | one(s) you will be reconciling to. Be aware of how |
| motivate and mobilize people. At a minimum, perception | | | | these systems are updated and enlist the cooperation |
| of a costly problem is needed, with some realization of | | | | of those involved in their operation and maintenance. |
| a need to correct it. | | | | Better results will be obtained if all transactions are |
| This article is also available on our website: | | | | posted before counting, especially if the inventory |
| PROACTION - Generating Best Practices. It is an | | | | system is in poor working order. This helps eliminate a |
| excerpt of a paper originally written by George Miller, | | | | very common source of errors, "cut-off" timing. In |
| Founder of PROACTION. It has been modified and | | | | particular, watch out for items in staging areas, QC, |
| updated by Paul Deis, PROACTION CEO. | | | | Shipping, Scrap, Bond, etc. It's best to do the survey |
| Try to tie company goals and objectives to project | | | | while operations are shut down, since it further |
| objectives, to help ensure that people "buy-in" to the | | | | reduces the chance of transaction cut-off problems. |
| project and will be measured and rewarded on the | | | | For improved objectivity, it is recommended that |
| results. | | | | people who are removed from "ownership" of the |
| Once the initial goals are attained, don't just declare | | | | current system be used to audit or even supervise this |
| victory and go home. Set up a lower key ongoing | | | | survey. Bias may be inadvertently or intentionally |
| maintenance effort to ensure that the problem stays | | | | introduced otherwise. |
| fixed and that further improvements are made.o An | | | | The survey should be used to help establish "baseline" |
| Executive Sponsor is needed, someone with the clout | | | | accuracy by area- for instance- "Store Room #1, |
| to keep resources and attention focused on the | | | | "Shipping Area", QC Hold #3", "Disk Assembly," and |
| problem until completion. Results are usually directly | | | | "Total." Publish the results after careful verification, then |
| proportional to the strength and commitment of the | | | | discuss and act on them. The initial survey often helps |
| executive sponsor. Sometimes it's not possible to get | | | | to establish the dialogue that propels successful |
| a sponsor until a case is made that there's a problem.o | | | | projects. It is possible that some diagnostic work can |
| A Project Leader and Multi-Disciplinary Team is | | | | be done during the survey, but in general, we have |
| required, preferably from Operations, Materials, Finance, | | | | found that diagnostics are problematic at best for a |
| Distribution and possibly, Process and Design | | | | poor inventory system without baseline figures, good |
| Engineering (depending upon the problems identified). In | | | | procedures in place and regular cycle counts. |
| a large organization, a full time project leader may be | | | | FIX THE SYSTEM |
| needed. People will be needed for inventory | | | | Institute Improved Policies and Procedures |
| verification, cycle counting and reconciliation. The | | | | Procedures are often in need of a major overhaul. |
| amount of manpower needed is dependent upon | | | | Many are poorly documented, unworkable or |
| organization size, complexity and magnitude of the | | | | cumbersome. The project diagnostics, team meetings, |
| problem. For example, one 500,000 sq. ft. process plant | | | | cycle count results, conference room pilot and |
| with about 4000 items and 30+% inventory accuracy | | | | employee suggestions can all funnel information to the |
| needed a full time coordinator, four full time cycle | | | | people who revise procedures. |
| counters and two part timers for six months, tapering | | | | Identify every single transaction and procedure |
| off after that. Often, consultants and corporate | | | | potentially affecting inventory accuracy. Review and, if |
| auditors participate to make projects more | | | | necessary, enhance, simplify and document them, then |
| successful.o A Project Plan is needed, incorporating | | | | thoroughly train all applicable personnel in their use. |
| recommendations from this paper and other | | | | Keep simple concise procedures available for |
| company-specific activities. This plan, along with a | | | | employees' ready access. Have employees practice |
| running list of accuracy related issues and actions, | | | | drill in procedure use. An inventory system test or |
| should be used to drive the project and focus efforts | | | | "demo" database is a good tool to practice with.o New |
| on activities needed to attain accuracy goals. Issues | | | | procedures/changes should be reviewed with users in |
| should be identified, put on a master issues list, | | | | advance, thoroughly tested and documented prior to |
| assigned to appropriate personnel to solve, then | | | | implementation.o Procedures should cover all aspects |
| discussed and tracked at every weekly meeting for | | | | of inventory transactions: receiving, inspection, stores, |
| the duration of the initial improvement project. | | | | issues to floor stock, production, substitutions, transfers, |
| The plan should contain specific activities, | | | | scrap, rework, return to vendor, completions to stock, |
| responsibilities and dates. It needs to be followed and | | | | shipments. |
| managed competently. Unless carefully managed, a | | | | Set Up Basic Inventory Movement Structure and |
| substantial amount of project time will be spent trying | | | | Controls |
| to figure out what the problems are, and getting | | | | Most companies lack a common understanding on |
| resources assigned to them. | | | | how inventory transactions- material and paperwork - |
| Choose Your Battles | | | | should flow. One of the first evident symptoms of this |
| Realize that there are limited resources available, and | | | | is an almost total inability to reconcile cycle counts of |
| that these cost money, so prioritize by tackling issues | | | | active items, due to transaction "cut-off" problems |
| offering the best payback and those that can be won. | | | | attributable to unpublished/unenforced transaction |
| Actual examples:o For one company, it was very hard | | | | document flow times. Forget about a full cycle counting |
| to keep track of color concentrates, since they were | | | | program until this is corrected. First, establish, implement |
| ladled out of barrels, were kept out on the floor, and | | | | and enforce:o Inventory "transaction flow map" |
| didn't cost all that much anyway. So, these and other | | | | showing all work centers/cells/stores areas, material |
| similar items were placed on "two bin" order control | | | | and paper flows, transaction types and account |
| and expensed, eliminating a whole class of inventory | | | | numbers, so that people will know what should happen. |
| record problems with little more than a stroke of a | | | | When people see a graphical depiction of system flow |
| pen.o Another firm had three storerooms. The first one | | | | and have it explained to them, it often helps them to |
| contained fabrics for airline seats and was very well | | | | decode the mysteries of a system.o Flow times - |
| organized and well run, so minimal effort was | | | | How long it should take to receive a part, move it to |
| expended to improve it. The second one was a poorly | | | | stores, issue it, move it between operations. Publish |
| controlled raw material storeroom with a short-timer | | | | these flow times, post them, and get people |
| supervisor about to retire. Material lead times were | | | | accustomed to working with them. Highlight |
| only a few days, so the effect of errors was less | | | | transactions missing flow time targets.o Cutoff times - |
| serious. We elected to wait out his retirement, which | | | | How long it should take to post a transaction after it |
| was only a couple of months away. The third | | | | physically occurred. Publish and highlight similar to the |
| storeroom contained purchased parts and specialty | | | | above item.o Drop points - Where material and |
| fabrications. Lead times were long, costs were high | | | | transaction documents should be placed. Mark these |
| and the consequences of errors were serious, so we | | | | areas plainly to reduce confusion. Painted lines on the |
| elected to initially focus on this area. To narrow scope | | | | floor, signs, sometimes even fences, may be needed |
| even further, we initially concentrated only on items | | | | to get the point across.o Logging and batch controls, |
| needed within the lead time horizon and ignored | | | | especially for key "gateway" transactions such as |
| obsolete and excess materials.o The VP, Finance in still | | | | receiving and shipping. Comparing daily posted |
| another manufacturing company agreed to waive | | | | transactions to the logs often helps detect missing or |
| physical inventories for areas demonstrating that | | | | erroneous data. Logs can also be useful in |
| accuracy goals were being met, freeing up resources | | | | reconstructing "crashed" systems. |
| for more productive purposes.o In general, controlled | | | | Write Cycle Counting Procedure |
| storerooms are the easiest to improve, since they are | | | | Cycle counting should be the principal ongoing |
| often physically restricted areas, have supervision | | | | performance measurement, diagnostic and |
| more oriented to accuracy concepts, transactions less | | | | problem-solving approach, basically "SPC for inventory |
| subject to process-related errors and they can be | | | | control." It is a procedure to help determine if the other |
| more easily counted. Then attack work-in-process | | | | inventory procedures are working. The procedure |
| areas, which are generally more challenging.o One | | | | needs to fully reflect the overall systems flow and |
| team uncovered dozens of accuracy issues. These | | | | timing. For instance, if inventories are updated daily by |
| were prioritized so that problem-solving resources | | | | MIS, it may be necessary to adjust for unposted |
| could be focused on the best payback items with the | | | | transactions prior to completing reconciliation.o In a |
| greatest chances of resolution.o A few companies we | | | | high-volume repetitive production in a backflush |
| worked with have gotten almost immediate payback | | | | environment, It is necessary to log production occurring |
| by conducting location audits. Simply check each | | | | between backflushes and to know precisely when |
| location and compare it to your records. Physical | | | | these were performed. In addition, knowing the |
| locations not in the records may be exciting windfalls. | | | | whereabouts of discrepant material routed for |
| The opposite case is cause for a corrective cycle | | | | inspection and alternate processing, but still unposted, is |
| count adjustment. This approach requires far less | | | | vital, since counts of material in the area may omit it. |
| resources than a physical count inventory.o Most | | | | Consignment inventory rules sometimes need revision |
| companies observed weren't able to reconcile all | | | | to facilitate cycle count reconciliation as well. |
| errors, especially in the beginning. They were advised | | | | Run a Control Group |
| not to even try. It's like attempting to bail out the ocean, | | | | Once the program is underway, team members often |
| because errors were being made faster than | | | | want to quickly start an ambitious, large scale program |
| inventory balances could be corrected, let alone | | | | of cycle counting. Some people come running out of |
| diagnosed and reconciled. So, they focused on | | | | cycle counting seminars, flushed with enthusiasm, |
| eliminating the principal CAUSES of errors initially. Every | | | | wanting to use their new tools immediately to vanquish |
| time a cause is identified and corrected, it may likely | | | | the demons of inventory error. In general, don't. Why? |
| eliminate dozens, hundreds or even thousands of | | | | Because in most cases the infrastructure isn't yet in |
| future potential errors. This concept may be difficult to | | | | place to support an effective cycle counting system. |
| sell to some accounting personnel, who have been | | | | Make sure it is in place BEFORE starting regular cycle |
| conditioned to balance every debit and credit to the | | | | counting, or you're in for some big disappointments and |
| penny. Choose your battles! | | | | loss of credibility. |
| DEFINE INVENTORY ACCURACY | | | | In the meantime, use the initial survey population as a |
| What It Isn't | | | | "control group" to help regularly and frequently assess |
| We have often been told by representatives of | | | | the propagation of errors. Count and reconcile these |
| various companies that their inventory accuracy was | | | | items over and over again until you start to get the |
| high, even "world class," 95, 98 or even 99+%, when in | | | | hang of what's wrong. Chances are, this will be a very |
| fact, there were surprise backorders, unplanned | | | | tough chore initially, because of the many things wrong |
| material shortages and unexplained excess inventories. | | | | with the system. Don't be surprised if you can't identify |
| When asked about inventory accuracy, shop floor and | | | | many item error causes with certainty in the initial |
| stores personnel would just smile and tell us their | | | | period. As you count them more frequently, there will |
| inventory horror stories. | | | | be shorter intervals between counts, increasing the |
| So why does this happen? There are different ways | | | | likelihood that error causes can be isolated. As the |
| of measuring it. For example:o One firm thought their | | | | basic controls identified above are established, they will |
| inventory records were outstanding because they | | | | eliminate many errors and make it simpler to identify |
| were accurate within $20,000 for a $6MM inventory, | | | | those that remain. Make sure that problems are |
| or 99.7% accurate, they boasted. Well, it turned out | | | | posted to the issues list, prioritized, assigned for |
| that this was merely an arithmetic sum of the financial | | | | resolution, discussed at meetings, completed, |
| errors and that the absolute value of the individual | | | | documented and resolved. |
| errors was actually $900,000. Even this sounded like | | | | At some point, when the team feels that they have |
| 85% accuracy. | | | | basic controls in place and have mastered control |
| But, operations people know that products are built | | | | group diagnostics, they can turn the cycle counts loose |
| with specific components and that customers are | | | | on a larger scale. |
| shipped specific products or services, not dollars. | | | | When the control group is running in the mid 90% |
| When other factors like posting cut-offs, location errors | | | | accuracy range, it's time to turn on large scale cycle |
| and part number errors were considered, it was | | | | counting. Companies trying to turn it on too early may |
| calculated that accuracy was actually only 66%! | | | | get swamped by massive numbers of irreconcilable |
| Inventory accuracy is the probability of finding the right | | | | errors. Some even compound the errors when they |
| items in the right location and quantity that the books | | | | start posting corrections before they've got |
| say are there. 66% accuracy means that 34% of | | | | reconciliation/posting procedures working satisfactorily. |
| items surveyed had quantities, locations or part | | | | Most error causes can be found and resolved during |
| numbers significantly differing from "book" records. | | | | the initial control group period. |
| Looking at it another way, for a ten item order, there | | | | Make Physical Changes |
| would be only a 15% probability of finding all parts | | | | Paint lines on floors to indicate drop points and |
| corresponding to what the books said was there. Is | | | | department boundaries. Record tare weights on all |
| that any way to run a business? By the way, it's sad | | | | containers used in weigh counting. Use bar code or |
| to say that 66% is about average. | | | | other accurate, efficient data acquisition methods. |
| Another reason for the accuracy credibility gap is that | | | | Deploy counting scales where appropriate. Isolate |
| people delude themselves, occasionally even lie. The | | | | obsolete inventory for final dispositioning. Assign |
| author once had to fire someone who was falsifying | | | | designated drop points for discrepant or "hold" status |
| counts. The sad news came out of a routine audit | | | | material. Ensure that there is adequate and appropriate |
| designed to check the effectiveness of the cycle | | | | material handling and storage equipment. Sometimes |
| counting system. More often, people just rationalize | | | | something as simple as lines on the floor, a fence or a |
| that things are much better than they really are. | | | | gate can make a significant difference. Consider a |
| Example: | | | | move to a process-related flow, which may greatly |
| What It Is | | | | simplify material/inventory control. |
| 95% accuracy is said to be the minimum acceptable | | | | A comprehensive facility location system is essential |
| level to run a formal system. Our experience is that | | | | for success in locating material quickly and efficiently |
| 95% is a lot better than the average company, but it's | | | | when it is needed All inbound and in-transit material |
| nowhere near what is required to run a world class | | | | should be directed to locations, or they should be |
| operation, where 98 or 99+% is more appropriate. | | | | assigned upon arrival. If the location system is simple |
| Going from 66% to 90% is easier than going from 90 | | | | enough, materials might be automatically routed. |
| to 95%, which is easier than going from 95 to 97%. | | | | Reduce the number of possibilities to make mistakes. |
| When a company sets a goal of 95, 98 or 99+% | | | | The location codes should be plainly marked all around |
| inventory accuracy, what should that mean? We | | | | the facility, so that there is no confusion about the |
| usually recommend the following accuracy criteria, | | | | location. Isolate/purge excessive, obsolete and |
| subject to company special requirements:o Quantity of | | | | damaged inventory. |
| book to reconciled physical inventory to be accurate, | | | | CONCLUSIONS |
| for example, within 1% for "A" items, 3% for "B" items | | | | As with most major change efforts, inventory |
| and 5% for "C" items. These targets should reflect | | | | accuracy needs strong, continuing management |
| relative value of the material and the limits of counting | | | | support to change the culture and practices.o Very little |
| process capabilities. Most firms compare physical to | | | | happens in some companies until top management |
| reconciled book quantity error vs. book quantity to | | | | makes poor results unacceptably uncomfortable to |
| measure accuracy, for convenience of computations. | | | | those failing to deliver.o Even after that, things |
| Sometimes we recommend comparing the calculated | | | | sometimes don't improve until meaningful performance |
| error to the weekly or monthly usage quantity, | | | | measurements and improvement mechanisms are |
| because it's statistically more valid, especially in a | | | | implemented.o Strong project leadership is the next |
| high-volume, low inventory environment.o Item | | | | most important factor, along with a sound approach |
| identification must be correct, or it counts for two | | | | and an implementation plan.o The price of continued |
| errors, since if it isn't what the records stated it was, | | | | inventory accuracy success is eternal vigilance. When |
| then it must be something else. Unless inventory people | | | | programs lose "mindshare," results often quickly |
| are very thorough and knowledgeable about item | | | | deteriorate.o Inventory accuracy is a permanent state |
| identities, these errors often go unrecognized until | | | | of mind, not a quickie, one-time project. Periodic |
| detected by an inspector, production operator, or even | | | | backsliding needs constant attention. This is one area |
| a customer. We recommend item verification before | | | | where zealots and dictators are needed! |
| storage or movement to the next process station. It is | | | | Successful inventory accuracy efforts often have five |
| helpful to post item specifications and photos and train | | | | phases: |
| employees in their use to reduce such errors.o Item | | | | 1. Realization that there is a problem |
| must be physically in the exact "book" location or it is | | | | 2. Agreement on a solution approach |
| considered an error. If you can't find it, that's even | | | | 3. Problem-solving phase |
| worse than not having it at all, because it cost money | | | | 4. Records correctionv |
| and it's taking up valuable space. Make sure you define | | | | 5. Ongoing cycle counting/maintenanceo Inventory |
| item locations neither too detailed nor too general. If too | | | | accuracy doesn't really improve by counting things. It |
| detailed, it will be burdensome to maintain the records | | | | only improves when basic systems, procedures and |
| and control material.o Timeliness of records - Must be | | | | training improve.o Identifying issues and resolving them |
| posted by some deadline, such as immediately when | | | | so that they never occur again is the key to achieving |
| moved, within an hour, or by the end of the shift when | | | | accuracy goals.o Leadership and peoples' attitudes are |
| transaction was physically executed. This greatly | | | | the two most important factors for success. |
| improves the timeliness of information and improves | | | | There are some significant differences in attaining |
| "cut-off" control for reports and reconciliations.o | | | | inventory accuracy in non-discrete, process, repetitive, |
| Accuracy percentage = (number of items sampled | | | | cellular and project-oriented enterprises. |
| meeting above criteria/all items sampled) x 100. We | | | | Learn them well and adapt to their needs. Realize also |
| sometimes convert performance measures to error | | | | that most companies are a mix of different |
| parts per million (PPM), to make measurements more | | | | environments, so mix approaches if warranted. |
| compatible with companies' quality systems. | | | | |